<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simply using Web 2.0 technologies does not guarantee an optimal experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inspireux.com/2009/05/01/simply-using-web-20-technologies-does-not-guarantee-an-optimal-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inspireux.com/2009/05/01/simply-using-web-20-technologies-does-not-guarantee-an-optimal-experience/</link>
	<description>User Experience quotes and articles to inspire and connect the UX community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainwebs</title>
		<link>http://www.inspireux.com/2009/05/01/simply-using-web-20-technologies-does-not-guarantee-an-optimal-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-5392</link>
		<dc:creator>rainwebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspireux.com/?p=728#comment-5392</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re an experienced desktop developer you know that it is absurd to think that even with the best Web 2.0 technologies based on AJAX you will ever reach the quality of a desktop application design. What should be the minimum anyway. You don&#039;t have the controls for this. So, you can try to reach something similar, but to go this way is pretty exhausting.

If you take Flex you can have a look at the &quot;old&quot; styleguides from the desktop and may have a 90% solution. So, the real problem is how good can I imitate the desktop to get something that has a user experience we can start to talk about. 

But, even then I wonder why we still have nothing better. The desktop metaphor is almost 40 years old (prototypes at PARC, 1969). How many centuries is this in computer years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re an experienced desktop developer you know that it is absurd to think that even with the best Web 2.0 technologies based on AJAX you will ever reach the quality of a desktop application design. What should be the minimum anyway. You don&#8217;t have the controls for this. So, you can try to reach something similar, but to go this way is pretty exhausting.</p>
<p>If you take Flex you can have a look at the &#8220;old&#8221; styleguides from the desktop and may have a 90% solution. So, the real problem is how good can I imitate the desktop to get something that has a user experience we can start to talk about. </p>
<p>But, even then I wonder why we still have nothing better. The desktop metaphor is almost 40 years old (prototypes at PARC, 1969). How many centuries is this in computer years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simply using Web 2.0 technologies does not guarantee an optimal &#8230; &#171; MyPage Builder</title>
		<link>http://www.inspireux.com/2009/05/01/simply-using-web-20-technologies-does-not-guarantee-an-optimal-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>Simply using Web 2.0 technologies does not guarantee an optimal &#8230; &#171; MyPage Builder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspireux.com/?p=728#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>[...] here: Simply using Web 2.0 technologies does not guarantee an optimal &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here: Simply using Web 2.0 technologies does not guarantee an optimal &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

